Teaching acceptance of digital technologies in higher education: Evolution and use from the models and theories that explain it

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.2.2860

Keywords:

Technology adoption, models, digital technologies, higher education, Systematic Literature Review

Abstract

At present, it is necessary to consider the problems that arise from the digital society and the transformations that university professors are undergoing to adapt to the changes generated by digital technologies (DT). Consequently, the need to analyze the context in which these changes are occurring emerges, and the idea of finding theories that help to interpret and reflect on issues related to technology and education is promoted. In order to know the state in question of the applicability of the theories and models of technology adoption in the university faculty and to be able to reveal which are the most outstanding and used constructs, we proceeded to the systematic review of the literature on models and theories of technology adoption allowing us to shed light on the advances in this field. Thus, 321 documents were compiled and through criteria of inclusion, exclusion and quality, 47 articles strictly related to the analysis were selected. On the one hand, it has been demonstrated that from the theory of Diffusion of Innovations (TDI), several important models and theories have emerged such as the model of technological acceptance (TAM) and the theory of Reasoned Action (TRA), highlighting the TAM model as the most robust and popular, this has led to its modification in several studies with the incorporation of new constructs, so from the original TAM it has been identified that the most used constructs are perceived utility, perceived ease of use and behavioral intent of use, to these are added more frequently the subjective norm, facilitating conditions and self-efficacy; on the other hand it is evident to determine that the technological adoption in the educational field is also analyzed from another perspective such as the pedagogical one.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajzen, I. (1991a). Measuring oral health behaviour in Flemish health care workers: An application of the theory of planned behaviour. Community Dental Health, 25(2), 107–114. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1922/CDH_2120VandenBroucke08

Ajzen, I. (1991b). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Al-Azawei, A., Parslow, P., & Lundqvist, K. (2017). Investigating the effect of learning styles in a blended e-learning system: An extension of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 1–23. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2741

Al-Emran, M., Mezhuyev, V., & Kamaludin, A. (2018). Technology Acceptance Model in M-learning context: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 125, 389–412. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.008

Atiquil Islam, A. Y. M. (2016). Development and validation of the technology adoption and gratification (TAG) model in higher education: A cross-cultural study between Malaysia and China. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 12(3), 78–105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4018/IJTHI.2016070106

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1986.

Basak, E., Gumussoy, C. A., & Calisir, F. (2015). Examining the factors affecting PDA acceptance among physicians: An extended technology acceptance model. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 6(3), 399–418. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.6.3.399

Becker, S. A., Cummins, M., Davis, A., Freeman, A., Hall, C. G., & Ananthanarayanan, V. (2017). NMC horizon report: 2017 higher education edition. Retrieved from The New Media Consortium:

Bin, E., Islam, A. Y. M. A., Gu, X., Spector, J. M., & Wang, F. L. (2020). A study of Chinese technical and vocational college teachers’ adoption and gratification in new technologies. British Journal of Educational Technology, 0(0). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12915

Davies, S., Mullan, J., & Feldman, P. (2017). Rebooting learning for the digital age: What next for technology-enhanced higher education? HEPI Report, 93, 46. Retrieved from http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Hepi_Rebooting-learning-for-the-digital-age-Report-93-02_02_17Web.pdf

Davis, F. (1989). Perceided Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15WCEE), 13(3), 319–340. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(98)00028-0

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111–1132.

Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Pujol-Jover, M., Gázquez-Abad, J. C., & Alegret, A. (2018). An extension of the technology acceptance model for online learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(7), 895–910. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1421560

Fokides, E. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ intention to use MUVES as practitioners - A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16(1), 47–68. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.28945/3645

Hidalgo, B. G., Rivera, L., & Delgadillo, R. (2019). Integration of Learning Management System Technology and Social Networking Sites in the E-Learning Mode : A Review and Discussion. ASEE Computers in Education (COED)Journal, 10(2), 1–13. Retrieved from http://asee-coed.org/index.php/coed/article/view/418

Hidalgo Cajo, B. G. (2015). Analisis Matematico del modelo educativo usando facebook: caso de estudio: Universidad Nacional de Chimborazo. Retrieved from http://openaccess.uoc.edu/webapps/o2/handle/10609/43111

Hsu, C. L., Lu, H. P., & Hsu, H. H. (2007). Adoption of the mobile Internet: An empirical study of multimedia message service (MMS). Omega, 35(6), 715–726. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.03.005

Islam, A. Y. M. A. (2014). Validation of the technology satisfaction model (TSM) Developed in higher education: The application of structural equation modeling. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 10(3), 44–57. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.2014070104

Jeong, H. I., & Kim, Y. (2017). The acceptance of computer technology by teachers in early childhood education. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(4), 496–512. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1143376

Keane, T., Keane, W. F., & Blicblau, A. S. (2016). Beyond traditional literacy: Learning and transformative practices using ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 21(4), 769–781. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9353-5

Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering. Technical Report, 2(3). Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.117.471

Kocaleva, M., Stojanovic, I., & Zdravev, Z. (2015). Model of e-Learning Acceptance and Use for Teaching Staff in Higher Education Institutions. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 7(4), 23–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2015.04.03

Lemay, D. J., Morin, M. M., Bazelais, P., & Doleck, T. (2018). Modeling Students’ Perceptions of Simulation-Based Learning Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 20, 28–37. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.004

Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers and Education, 54(2), 600–610. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009

Liu, Y., Li, H., & Carlsson, C. (2010). Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1211–1219. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.018

Luan, W. S., & Teo, T. (2009). Investigating the Technology Acceptance among Student Teachers in Malaysia: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 18(2). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3860/taper.v18i2.1327

Mazman Akar, S. G. (2019). Does it matter being innovative: Teachers’ technology acceptance. Education and Information Technologies, 24(6), 3415–3432. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09933-z

Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Moore, G. C., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation., (January 2018). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2.3.192

Motaghian, H., Hassanzadeh, A., & Moghadam, D. K. (2013). Factors affecting university instructors’ adoption of web-based learning systems: Case study of Iran. Computers and Education, 61(1), 158–167. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.09.016

Nagy, J. (2018). Evaluation of Online Video Usage and Learning Satisfaction: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1).

Okyere-Kwakye, E., Nor, K. M., & Ologbo, A. C. (2016). Technology acceptance: Examining the intentions of ghanaian teachers to use computer for teaching. African Journal of Library Archives and Information Science, 26(2), 119–132.

Park, E., & Kwon, S. J. (2016). The adoption of teaching assistant robots: A technology acceptance model approach. Program-Electronic Library and Information System., 50(4), 354–366. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-02-2016- 0017

Renda dos Santos, L. M., & Okazaki, S. (2014). Marco Teórico de la Adopción de la Enseñanza On-Line. Desafio Online, 2, 790–813. Retrieved from https://www.bps.go.id/dynamictable/2018/05/18/1337/persentase-panjang-jalan-tol-yang-beroperasi-menurut-operatornya-2014.html

Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. Inc., New York.

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations4 The Free Press New York Google Scholar.

Ros, S., Hernández, R., Caminero, A., Robles, A., Barbero, I., Maciá, A., & Holgado, F. P. (2015). On the use of extended TAM to assess students’ acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(6), 1250–1271. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12199

Sánchez-Mena, A., Martí-Parreño, J., & Aldás-Manzano, J. (2017). The effect of age on teachers’ intention to use educational video games: A TAM approach. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(4), 355–366. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1154704.pdf

Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. van, & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers and Education, 54(1), 103–112. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010

Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model (TAM): A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to explaining teachers’ adoption of digital technology in education. Computers and Education, 128, 13–35. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009

Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers and Education, 94, 252–275. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.008

Tarcan, E., Varol, E. S., Kantarci, K., & Firlar, T. (2012). A study on Kazakh Academicians’ information technology acceptance. Kazak Akademisyenlerin Bilgi Teknolojilerini Kabulü Üzerine Bir Araştidotlessrma, 62(62), 205–230. Retrieved from http://www.acarindex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423873036.pdf

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(October 2014), 144–176. Retrieved from http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/pdf/10.1287/isre.6.2.144

Teo, T, Ursavaş, O. F., & Bahçekapili, E. (2012). An assessment of pre-service teachers’ technology acceptance in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 191–202. Retrieved from http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84858763296&partnerID=40&md5=ef3aac58ae408c5dcc82c482d62e6f92

Teo, Timothy. (2010). Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(2), 253–262. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-009-9066-4

Teo, Timothy. (2012). Examining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: An integration of the Technology Acceptance Model and Theory of Planned Behavior. Interactive Learning Environments, 20(1), 3–18. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494821003714632

Teo, Timothy. (2015). Comparing pre-service and in-service teachers’ acceptance of technology: Assessment of measurement invariance and latent mean differences. Computers and Education, 83, 22–31. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.015

Teo, Timothy, Ursavaş, Ö. F., & Bahçekapili, E. (2011). Efficiency of the technology acceptance model to explain pre-service teachers’ intention to use technology: A Turkish study. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 28(2), 93–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/10650741111117798

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 125–143.

Traxler, J. (2009). Learning in a Mobile Age. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning (IJMBL), 1(1), 1–12. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4018/jmbl.2009010101

Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward A Hierarchical Model of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29(C), 271–360. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. Retrieved from https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Source: MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Wong, K. T., Teo, T., & Russo, S. (2012). Influence of gender and computer teaching efficacy on computer acceptance among Malaysian student teachers: An extended technology acceptance model. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(7), 1190–1207. Retrieved from https://ajet.org.au/index.php/AJET/article/view/796/96

Yu, Z. (2020). Visualizing co-citations of technology acceptance models in education. Journal of Information Technology Research, 13(1), 77–95. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4018/JITR.2020010106

Published

2020-07-27

How to Cite

Hidalgo-Cajo, B. G. (2020). Teaching acceptance of digital technologies in higher education: Evolution and use from the models and theories that explain it. UTE Teaching & Technology (Universitas Tarraconensis), 1(2), 61–76. https://doi.org/10.17345/ute.2020.2.2860

Issue

Section

Articles