Pollution of the oceans by plastics and effectiveness of legal norms of protection

Rebeca Isabel Muñoz Arosemena, Renata Calheiros Zarelli, Miguel Etinger de Araujo Junior

Resum

Studies established that oceans cover 71% of the Earth's surface. This area of the planet, nowadays, suffers from plastic pollution due to its inadequate disposal, which affects marine fauna and flora. Only 9% of these plastics are reused or recycled, meaning that the rest ends up being garbage that goes into different places. According to United Nations Environmental Program, about 90% of the waste that is floating in the oceans comes from plastic or derived. Given this scenario, the UN has established the conservation and sustainable use of oceans, seas and marine resources as one of its sustainable development main goals, to be accomplished in 2030. This goal will not be achieved without the containment of contemporary predatory capitalism, were the general model of life is linked to consumption, as a way of demonstrating the identity of the individual, his ethical values and behaviors, requiring more effective coercive norms, organized with economic incentive policies. Considering that Brazil and Panama are ROCRAM members, and that one of its main principles is to integrate efforts and exchange experiences in order to make more effective implementation of international conventions on maritime pollution, it’s possible to compare these two countries related legislation. As a result of an ongoing research, this paper proposes as a mechanism to approach to a possible answer and to address the following points in the investigation: What are the international environmental agreements related to the protection against incorrect plastic disposal and ocean pollution? What are theenvironmental legal norms applied by Brazil and Panama, and the relationship between the legal norms and the effectiveness (or not) of pollution reduction? The methodology is based on a descriptive investigation, through data collection, making an analysis and focusing on solving the questions established above, according to the existing international legislation, aiming for ocean protection.

Paraules clau

Environmental Law; Maritime pollution; Plastic pollution; Maritime Protection

Text complet:

PDF (English)

Referències


Sustainable Agenda. Goal 14, Protect marine life. Available at: https://www.unric.org/pt/ods-link-menu/31983-objetivo-14-potecao-dos-recursos-marinhos

ARAP. Plastic pollution on seas. Interview made to Edison Barbieri, found at http://www.pesca.agricultura .sp.gov.br/imagens/231 Last access: 15/june/2018

BAUMANN, Zygmunt. Globalização: As consequências humanas. Tradução: Marcus Penchel. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar Editor, 1999.

BRASIL, Instituto Trata. Ociosidade das Redes de Esgoto. 2015. Disponível em: http://www.tratabrasil.org.br/datafiles/estudos/ociosidade/relatorio-completo.pdf. Acessado em 16 jun. 2018.

BRASIL, Instituto Trata. Perdas de Água: Desafios ao avanço do Saneamento Básico e à Escassez Hídrica. Março, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.tratabrasil.org.br/datafiles/estudos/perdas-de-agua/Relatorio-Perdas-2013.pdf. Acessado em 16 jun. 2016.

BRASIL. Ministério do Meio Ambiente. O tamanho do problema. Available at: http://www.mma.gov.br/responsabilidade-socioambiental/producao-e-consumo-sustentavel/saco-e-um-saco/saiba-mais. Last access 14 jun 2018.

FIELD, Barry C.; FIELD, Martha K. Introdução à Economia do Meio Ambiente. 6ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman., 2014.

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization. Marine plastic waste protection advances. Available at:http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/SecretaryGeneral/Secretary-Generals SpeechesToMeetings/Pages/ MEPC72closing.aspx)

GARCIA, Leonardo de Medeiros. Consumo sustentável – a proteção do meio ambiente no Código de Defesa do Consumidor. Salvador: Editora JusPODIVM, 2016. p. 27-32. Translation made by the authors.

GUNA, Karen-National Geographic. Denmark and the reduction of plastic bags. Available in: https://www.nationalgeographic.es/medio-ambiente/2018/05/asi-ha-logrado-dinamarca-reducir-el-uso-de-bolsas-de-plastico

LEBOW, Victor. Journal of Retailing. Price competition in 1955.Available at: <http://www.gcafh.org/edlab/Lebow.pdf>. Last access: 14/june/2018.

LEMOS, Patrícia Faga Iglesias. Resíduos Sólidos e Responsabilidade Civil Pós-consumo. São Paulo: Editora Revista dos Tribunais, 2011.

LIPOVETSKY, Gilles. The paradoxical happiness: essay on the hyperconsumption society. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2007, p. 45

LUTOSA, Maria Cecília J.; YOUNG, Carlos Eduardo F. Política Ambiental. In: KUPFER, David; HASENCLEVER, Lia. Economia Industrial: Fundamentos Teóricos e Práticos no Brasil. 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2002. Cap. 24, p. 569-578

MARTORELLI, Eduardo Barbosa. Política Ambiental: dos limites do comando e controle à potencialidade dos instrumentos econômicos. Brasília – Brasília, 2015. p.15

MCARTHUR, Ellen. The new plastics economy. Rethinking the future of plastics. Available at: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/EllenMacA rthurFoundation_TheNewPlasticsEconomy_15-3-16.pdf. Last access: 2/may/2018.

MORAES, Sandra R. R.; TUROLLA, F. A. Visão Geral dos Problemas e da Política Ambiental no Brasil. Informações Econômicas, São Paulo, v. 34, p.32.

MOTTA, Ronaldo Seroa da; RUTENBEEK, Jack e HUBER, Richard. Uso de instrumentos econômicos na gestão ambiental da América Latina e Caribe: lições e recomendações. Discussion text nº 440. IPEA. Rio de Janeiro, 1996. p. 28.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17345/rcda2441



Enllaços refback

  • No hi ha cap enllaç refback.


Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental