Multi-level Climate Governance: Polycentricity and Local Innovation
Abstract: The polycentric approach constructed according to Elinor Ostrom’s theory is a suitable substitute as a pluralistic mode of governance with the objective of reclaiming the former degree of faith of the citizens and communities that had been shaken by the failed climate change initiatives implemented on a global scale. Centering its attention on the lower levels of governance, the polycentric approach offers wide scope for improving the innovative steps that can positively affect the entire global climate system through acquisition of knowledge and learning, especially in the instances of energy transition like the German Energiewende (Renewable Energy Revolution) and the Barcelona Local Energy Agency that are devised for implementation through the active involvement of the local communities. The current study discusses the application of the polycentric approach to multi-level climate governance, particularly highlighting the importance of local innovation as the means to control the global climate crisis, harnessing the collective effort to secure substantial levels of reliability and cooperation between the stakeholders and institutions.
Text complet:PDF (English)
AXELROD, Robert. Review: Beyond the Tragedy of the Commons. A Discussion of Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action by Elionor Ostrom, in Perspectives on Politics, vol. 8, n. 02, 569-593, 2010.
BARCELONA CITY COUNCIL. Compromís Ciutadà per a la Sostenibilitat (Citizen Commitment for Sustainability 2012-2022). Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona, 2012.
BASURTO, Xavier and OSTROM, Elinor. The Core Challenges of Moving Beyond Garret Hardin, in Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, vol. 01, n. 03, 255-259, 2009.
BAUWENS, Thomas. Polycentric Governance Approaches for a Low-Carbon Transition: The Roles of Community-Based Energy Initiatives in Enhancing the Resilience of Future Energy Systems, In Labanca, N. (ed), Complex Systems and Social Practices in Energy Transitions: Framing Energy Sustainability in the Time of Renewables, pp. 119-145, London: Springer, 2017.
BODANSKY, Daniel, BRUNÉE, Jutta and RAJAMANI, Lavanya. International Climate Change Law. Oxford University Press, 2017.
BULKELEY, Harriet and BETSILL, Michele. Rethinking Sustainable Cities: Multilevel Governance and the Urban Politics of Climate Change, in Environmental Politics, num. 14, 42-53, 2005.
CALVET-MIR, Laura and MARCH, Hug. Crisis and Post-crisis Urban Gardening Initiatives from a Southern European Perspective: The Case of Barcelona. European Urban and Regional Studies, Sage Journals, 1-16, 2017.
CLANCY, Erin A. The Tragedy of the Global Commons, in Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, num. 5, 601-619, 1998.
COLE, Daniel H. Advantages of a Polycentric Approach to Climate Change Policy, in Nature Climate Change, vol. 05, 2015.
DORSCH, Marcel J. and FLATCHSLAND, Christian Flatchsland. A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance, in Global Environmental Politics, Vol. 17, Number 2, 45-64, 2017.
FALKNER, Robert Falkner. The Paris Agreement and the New Logic of International Climate Politics, in International Affairs, num. 92, 1107-112, 2016.
FENNY, David, BERKES, Fikret, MCCAY, Bonnie J. and ACHESON, James M. The Tragedy of the Commons: Twenty-Two Years Later, vol. 18, Human Ecology, 02-19, 1990.
GILLARD, Ross, GOULDSON, Andrew, PAAVOLA, Jouni and VAN ALSTINE, James. Can national blockages accelerate the development of polycentric governance? Evidence from climate change policy in the United Kingdom. Global Environmental Change, num. 45, 174-182, 2017.
GOLDTHAU, Andreas. Rethinking the Governance of Energy Infrastructure: Scale, Decentralization and Polycentrism. Energy Research and Social Science, num. 1, 134-140, 2014.
GONZALES REYES, L. Bienes Comunes, in Zubizarreta, J. H., González, E. y Ramiro, P. Diccionario Crítico de Empresas Transnacionales. Claves para enfrentar el Poder de las Grandes Corporaciones. Barcelona: Icaria Editorial, 2012.
HARDIN, Garrett. The Tragedy of the Commons, in Science 1243, 1968, reprinted in Fred P. Bosselman, Replaying the Tragedy of the Commons, 13, Yale J. on Reg. 391.
HAKE, Jürgen-Friedrich, FISCHER, Wolfgang, VENGHAUS, Sandra and WECKENBROCK, Christoph. The German Energiewende – History and Status Quo. Energy, num. 92, 532-546, 2015.
JÄNICKE, Martin. Accelerators of global energy transition: horizontal and vertical reinforcement in multi-level climate governance. Potsdam: Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies, 2013.
JÖRGENSEN, Kirsten, JOGESH, Anu and MISHRA, Arabinda. Multi-level Climate Governance and the Role of the Subnational Level, in Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12:4, 235-245, 2015.
KEOHANE, Robert O. and VICTOR, David G. Cooperation and Discord in Global Climate Policy, in Nature Climate Change, num. 6, 2016.
MERINO PÉREZ, L. Perspectivas sobre la Gobernanza de los Bienes y la Ciudadanía en la Obra de Elinor Ostrom, in Revista Mexicana de Sociología n. 76 (especial), 77-104, 2014.
MOORE, J. A. Moore. Science as a Way of Knowing – Human Ecology, in American Zoologist, num. 25, 483-637, 1985.
OSTROM, Elinor. “Tragedy of the Commons” in The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. S. Durlauf & L. Blume, eds. New York: Plagrave Macmillan, 2008.
_______. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
_______. Common-Pool Resources and Institutions Toward a Revised Theory, in Handbook of Agricultural Economics, vol. 02, Edited by B. Gardner and G. Rauser, 2002.
_______. Beyond Markets and States: Policentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems, in American Economic Review, num. 100, 641-672, 2010.
________. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change, in Global Environmental Change, num. 20, 550-557, 2010.
________. A Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. Policy Research Working Paper 5095, World Bank, 200.
_______. A Multi-Scale Approach to Coping with Climate Change and Other Collective Action Problems. Solutions 1 (2): 27-36 (2010).
OSTROM, Vicent, TIEBOUT, Charles M. and WARREN, Robert. The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas: A Theoretical Inquiry, in American Political Science Review, num. 55 (4), 831-842, 1961.
_______. Polycentricity – Part I, in Polycentricity and Local Public Economics. Ed. Michel Mc Ginis, 52-74. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.
QUITZOW, Leslie, CANZLER, Weert, GRUNDMANN, Philipp, LEIBENATH, Markus, MOSS, Timothy and RAVE, Tilmann. The German Energiewende – What’s happening?, in Utilities Policy, vol. 41, 163-171, 2016.
RAMOS OLIVOS, A. El Concepto de Bienes Comunes en la Obra de Elinor Ostrom, in Ecología Política, num. 45, 116-121, 2013.
RENN, Ortwin and MARSHALL, Jonathan Paul. Coal, Nuclear and Renewable Energy Policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Police, 99, 224-232, 2016.
RODGERS, Christopher. Reversing the Tragedy of the Commons – Sustainable Management and the Commons Act 2006, in Modern Law Review, num. 73, 461-486, 2010.
SONNENSCHEIN, J. and HENNICKE, P. (eds) The German Energiewende. A Transition towards an efficient, sufficient Green Energy Economy. International Institute for Industrial Environmental Economics, Lund University, 2015.
SOVACOOL, Benjamin K. An International Comparison of Four Polycentric Approaches to Climate and Energy Governance, in Energy Policy, num. 39, 3832-3844, 2011.
TOSUN, Jale and SCHOENEFELD, Jonas. Collective Climate Action and Networked Climate Governance. WiREs Clim Change 2017, 8: e440.
WALKER, James M., GARDNER, Roy, HERR, Andrew Herr and OSTROM, Elinor, Collective Choice in the Commons: Experimental Results on Proposed Allocation Rules and Votes, in The Economic Journal, 110, 212-234, 2000.
- No hi ha cap enllaç refback.
Copyright (c) 2018 Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental